Pandas vs Polars: Why Speed Matters

May 22, 2024

For years, Pandas has been the default tool for handling tabular data in Python. It has great documentation and an answer for nearly every question on Stack Overflow.

But as CSVs and tables get larger, Pandas often struggles. It uses one CPU core at a time and creates large memory copies.

That is where Polars comes in.

Why Polars is Fast

Polars is written in Rust and built from day one to use all your computer's CPU cores automatically.

  • Parallel processing: While Pandas works on one core, Polars puts all available cores to work.
  • Memory efficiency: Polars uses Apache Arrow under the hood, meaning it handles memory far better and crashes much less often.
  • Lazy evaluation: In Polars, you can write out your transformation steps first. Polars looks at the whole plan, cuts out wasted work, and runs only when you ask for the result.
import polars as pl
 
# Reads and filters efficiently
df = (
    pl.scan_csv("sales_data.csv")
    .filter(pl.col("revenue") > 1000)
    .group_by("region")
    .agg(pl.col("revenue").sum())
    .collect()
)

Which One Should You Use?

  • Stick with Pandas if your dataset is small (under 1–2 GB) or if you rely on packages that only support Pandas DataFrames.
  • Switch to Polars if you find yourself waiting minutes for simple queries, running out of RAM, or working with millions of rows.

For modern data work, learning Polars is one of the best time investments you can make.